Design Your Own Wrestling Singlet

commitment to how much take forward the Law Sinde

When the call Sinde Law seemed to have died in the House of Representatives, now, through a covenant of the PSOE and the PP is to resurrect the project made some changes. Have begun to appear again comments and opinions and all kinds. Media, Internet, politicians and lawyers, pour all comments for or against the now famous draft law (I myself, in a previous post I argued that the project was a legal aberration and therefore would not be very long).

But, let's see, no one has yet realized that it is very difficult to put gates to the internet and, To approve or not approve this law, will be very difficult to defend effectively the intellectual property creators, initiating administrative proceedings or in court proceedings to wind up pages of links and thus prevent downloads?.

should have

that if one of these sites are threatened by a procedure in a few hours can maneuver and load the page in a foreign server, where English law and has no power to act. Within an hour the owner of a page of links can migrate everything to a foreign server and Google just a few days and have recovered their position. In turn, the users of that page of links, with a simple message on Twitter may already know their new location.

If problems arise are again hosting the new server, either because the English justice through international judicial cooperation agreements or justice the country where the server is located, touch noses, then nothing happens, everything is migrated to another server hosted in another country and that's the problem.

In short, why such obstinacy in taking forward a law that will be totally irrelevant?. English law currently has the means to defend intellectual property, but the problem is the rigidity and slowness of the judicial administration, and this is not going to change the new Act and therefore I think what is that creators should adapt to new technological times and try to partner with them to defend their interests. It is not good to continue anchored in something which is already obsolete.